STOP THE PRESSES!!!! BIG NEWS!!!
I have TOTALLY JUST FOUND Kate Schafer Testerman's PERSONAL BLOG. Eg not the Ask Daphne one.
And I did it by NOT stalking her.
YAY for everything!!!
Okay, so, first let me tell you e'old'e story, and then the link!
So, I was reading
Doyce Testerman's blog, as I often do, and, as I said the other day, he is Kate's husband.
And
he made some claims (!) on his blog about doing the dishes at home and such, and I thought, being a typical male, that perhaps he was all talk and no action :P So I left a comment asking if he had actually
done the dishes. As a joke, see.
And he wrote back saying yes he had, and then Kate wrote back confirming that very point too.
And instead of her comment being linked to
Daphne, it was linked to something called "
KTBuffy".
Hmmm, I thought,
This is weird. Especially since this person is claiming to be Kate, Doyce's husband. I'd better check it out.
And so I did, and I was greeted with a bunch of shoes (very Kate) and an explanation saying it was a non-publishing private blog of
Kate's about "these posts have been a repository of my interests, from travel, music, books, shopping, photography, pop culture, and a million other things".
And so, following Kate's private blog has begun!
Hoorah!
Do I feel vaguely like a stalker? A little bit.
But hey. It's not as if it's a private
private website or anything! :P
What I wanted to talk about today is something that has been bugging me for about a week or so, and while it's not
directly related to publishing, it's interesting, and I know people will have a variety of opinions.
A few weeks ago - actually, it may have only been two weeks ago, but whatever - I was in another suburb before work - at The Gift Shop - and when I got to the station to go to work, it was running late.
As per usual, I should say. But nonetheless, it was running late, and I started to freak out, cuz I was about to be late for work.
So I called my parents house, and managed to convince my sister - God bless her! - to come and get me and take me to work.
She's only just got her licence, and hasn't driven where I was much.
I called work and explained to a co-worker - as the boss was serving someone - the situation and said I'd be there ASAP.
My sister finally arrived - proud of herself for finding me! - and I got to work half an hour late. I assured my sister it was fine and it wasn't her fault - which it wasn't - but I still felt awful for being late, and didn't want to get into trouble!
I ran into work full of apologise, but no-one wanted to hear it: "It's fine, it's life, things happen, trains are late. Doesn't matter, who cares, you're here now!"
Today at Marketing, I was helping with this mail-out, and when we tallied everything up, we were sort approx 35 labels. A massive man-hunt that took hours ensured, trying to find the missing ones.
Finally, finally, we went through this list and realized that five were infact missing, but, because I am an IDIOT I mis-counted one of the piles of envelopes. I had them in piles of twenty, and I counted 330 instead of 360 (I retain: I'm an English person! Not Maths! Hahaha but I know it was simple counting :( ).
All those hours, thinking we'd lost 35, when it was only 5.
I felt TERRIBLE and couldn't stop apologising.
The woman who was co-ordinating the mail-out laughed and laughed and said her dad always said, "Measure twice, cut once" (he was a carpenter).
She kept telling me what an awesome job I'd done today, I made such head-aways etc.
And she did not care one bit that I messed the counting up.
I've been thinking about these two events, and relating them back to other, previous jobs, where if you were five seconds late you'd get blasted. A mistake like the counting - which cost hours - would have probably resulted in a verbal warning. Or at the very least a stern talking to.
I couldn't believe these two jobs, Marketing and The Gift Shop, didn't care. "It's life" they said, "You make mistakes, trains are late, shit happens".
And how true is that! But I've mostly been in situations where you get blasted.
And you know what? I went home tonight feeling shit cuz I'd majorly stuffed the counting up, but I didn't feel as bad as I'd feel had I been told off. And now, when I work at Marketing again on Thursday, I'm not going to turn up with dread that everyone hates me.
Because it's life. People stuff up.
Anyway, that's my little rant about being told off. I'll stop now :P
Speaking of Doyce, he has a fantastic post on the
Rules of Three. The post is so informative and I urge everyone to head over there and read it!
The Rules of Three are:-Only three facts in any description. This is another Zelazny tip that I find wonderfully straight-forward to implement. When you’re describing something (a person, a thing, a place, whatever), you only get to mention three facts. The reasoning is that the reader is only going to remember three facts anyway, so you’re better off dictating what those three things are rather than letting them cherry-pick from a two-page description of your protag’s love interest (pro-tip: I don’t give a fuck about the brand of their clothes). You can cheat and add extra bits as the story progresses.
-Only three uses of the same joke. Seriously, it’s not funny after that.
-Only three uses of the same anything. Be it a particular application of a superpower, vampire hypnosis, a dance move… whatever. Three.
-Only three adverbs per story. Might as well put a hard limit on the little fuckers.
-Only three exclamations points per story. Actually, “one per 50,000 words” is better, but you can have more in your first draft. EVERY SINGLE ONE must be in dialog, though. Don’t make me get the hose.
-Only three ellipses per story. That might be harsh. Maybe Three-per-25k words, but you can’t end ANY PARAGRAPH with them.
-Only three ‘nods’ per… chapter? You (and by that, I mean ‘I’) should do even better than that, but it’s a first draft.
-Only three ’shrugs’ per… aww, hell. Just try to control it.Isn't that genius? TAKE NOTE, EVERYONE!
You should also head on over to
Steph's blog, where today, is it not her words that are brilliant - although they often (okay, all the time!) are, but her pictures. She has complied a mini-list of the photos that are about her new NaNoWriMo novel. The pictures are fantastic, pure and simple. As as one of the commenters said, if her novel is half as good as the pictures...!
I particularly like
this picture, because it ties in with me letting go and over thinking things!!!
Congrats to
Lili Wilkinson who has clocked up over 27,000 NaNoWriMo words! Hoorah!
Lisa and Laura talk about growing up. When I was little, I wanted to be the following - and in this order: a nurse (no idea why, I'm AWFUL with needles!) & a marine biologist (let's not remember the fact that I basically failed biology).
In between, various and random careers surfaced, but those are the main two.
But, despite all that, I've
always wanted to write. Which I have.
I always told people that owning my own bookstore was my 'proper' career, as you can't make money from writing.
I do want to do both things, but for the mean time, I am focusing on my writing.
Speaking of money and writing, we were talking in class the other day, and although I can't remember the specific topic, money and writing came up, and almost everyone in the class said that they wanted to make money out of their writing.
Am I the only person in the entire world that doesn't
care if she/he doesn't make money from writing?!
I mean sure, it'd be nice, but it's not the end-all. I'll still write.
You can still sell a novel, and be poor, and make more money. What happens if it doesn't make over the advance?
I didn't get paid for the two articles in
mX, but that doesn't mean I regret wasting the time writing the articles.
I don't get paid for writing for Media Search (although I get a hell of a lot of free stuff!) but that doesn't mean I'm going to stop writing for them.
Money is good, but if someone offered me a publishing contract for my novel, which included no money, I certaintly wouldn't turn it down.
To finish up (a very ranty) post, I'd like everyone to check out Rachelle Gardner's newest post.
She defines various publishing/bookstore/sales terms, and talks about money and returns.
I must say, after working in the bookstore for five years, when she says things like, "In tough times, bookstores occasionally return books for credit rather than paying their bills with actual money, setting into motion a devastating financial spiral for many publishers (who actually need cash to run their business, not a warehouse full of unsold books)."It's all I can do to start ranting all over again, about how bookstores are worst off than publishers, bla bla bla, which I won't go into.
A similar thing happened in class the other day: we are writing this chain novel in one of my classes (where each person has a chapter to write) and we're in the process of publishing/printing it.
Our teacher, last class, mentioned she wanted to side-step Corporate Communications. Basically, Marketing & CC (where I work remember!) has to approve all out-going leaflets, posters, signs, booklets etc anything with our Tafe's logo on it. The Communications Officer does a copy-edit, proof reads and approves everything to make sure the style suits our style guide, doesn't offend anyone, etc etc.
Now, in re to the chain novel, they're thinking of getting an ISBN and selling it.
It seems to me that it should go through CC. It's a publication from our Tafe that's going out into the public: it
should go through CC.
So I went up to our teacher and told her that. She said it takes to long. I didn't argue: there's one officer, and a whole lot of work. What do people expect? I know he does get help sometimes - I've copy-edited and proof read publications for him before - but basically it's him.
Now, to tie that with Rachelle's post, I guess I feel protective over CC and the bookstore, since I've been involved with both of them, and understand where they are coming from.
OKAY.It is officially the end of a very ranty post.
Have a great night everyone!